HOLIXORASix products live in production.
No engineering team. No sprint reviews. No Jira board. No contractor to chase.
Just systems that build systems.
The Products
Each one is in production. Real users. Real data. Real revenue.
Archily.pro. AI architectural rendering and BOQ extraction. Upload a drawing. Get a studio-quality render in under 60 seconds. 63+ users across 5 continents.
Mercora. Full ERP replacing a legacy Java system. 140 domain entities. Inventory, purchasing, ARAP, warehouse, marketing. Nine modules. One deployment.
Hanoman HMS. Hotel and resort management. Dual-currency RP/USD. Reservations, rooms, outlet billing, package management. 28+ endpoints.
Three more in active build: HRD, Accounting, Credit System.
Same pattern. Ship complete. Test thoroughly. Hand to client.
What Makes It Possible
The bottleneck in software development is not intelligence. It is time.
Traditional teams write code in parallel with meetings about code. They context-switch between projects. They onboard. They review each other's work.
At Holixora, a Claude Code sub-agent receives a domain spec and returns a working module: service layer, endpoints, schemas, unit tests. It does not attend standups. It does not need onboarding. It works at 3am on a Sunday if that is when the task runs.
I define the domain. AI executes the build. I verify what ships.
One person. Six products. The production record is the proof.
The Economics
A traditional team to build and maintain six products: Rp 80-200 million per month before a single feature ships.
Timeline: 12 months minimum. That is the quote every software house gives.
Holixora's model inverts this. Build cost is a fraction. Timeline is measured in days per module, not months per product.
That difference compounds. More runway. More experiments. More products shipping.
What This Means for Your Business
If your operations run on outdated software, the obstacle is not that software is expensive to build.
The obstacle is you have been talking to the wrong builder.